"Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes:
> That is at least partially correct. It does fix the issue, but I'm not
> 100% sure it's the fix we want. I'm looking at two different ways right
> now. Right now we also build exclusively against a static version of
> OpenSSL, and I (and everyone I spoke to about it) think it's better to
> go with the DLL version. Which will require a couple of different fixes.
Okay, I'll leave this as an open item till you send a patch.
regards, tom lane