Re: ice-broker scan thread
| От | Mark Kirkwood |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: ice-broker scan thread |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 438BD6E6.1000107@paradise.net.nz обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: ice-broker scan thread (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: ice-broker scan thread
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au> writes: > >>I haven't had time to prototype whether we can easily implement async IO > > > Just as with any suggestion to depend on threads, you are going to have > to show results that border on astounding to have any chance of getting > this in. Otherwise the portability issues are just going to make it not > worth the trouble. Do these ideas require threads in principle? ISTM that there could be (additional) process(es) waiting to perform pre-fetching or async io, and we could use the usual IPC machinary to talk between them... cheers Mark
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: