Re: Add parallelism and glibc dependent only options to reindexdb

Hi

Thank you, v9 code and behavior looks good for me. Builds cleanly, works with older releases. I'll mark Ready to
Commiter.

> I don't have a strong opinion here. If we change for >=, it'd be
> better to also adapt vacuumdb for consistency. I didn't change it for
> now, to stay consistent with vacuumdb.

Yep, no strong opinion from me too.

regards, Sergei