surabhi.ahuja wrote:
> i checked the locale it is giving:
>
> LANG=en_US.iso885915
> LC_CTYPE="en_US.iso885915"
If you Google for "ISO-8859-15 Latin9" the top two results seem to give
details. Oh - there are two naming systems for character sets, just to
make things even more complicated.
Now, traditionally you'd have used Latin1 (ISO-8859-1), but the
introduction of the Euro meant they needed to introduce a new character.
They took the opportunity to make some other changes too and called the
results Latin9 (ISO-8859-15).
OK - now the original problem was with a database not having a UNICODE
encoding. It does look like this is because the environment on this
machine is Latin9 rather than UTF-8. It's easy to have this problem, and
I always recommend setting the encoding explicitly when creating a
database cluster (initdb --encoding=UTF8). If you installed from a
package, it might have chosen a default for you though.
HTH
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd