Re: libpq's pollution of application namespace

Tom Lane wrote:

>Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes:
>  
>
>>What other linkers do we need to support?
>>    
>>
>
>All the non-GNU ones.
>
>(I'm already desperately unhappy about the thin representation of 
>non-GNU toolchains in the build farm...)
>
>
>  
>

Me too. If you provide a list of the most important platforms/toolsets 
missing I will see if I can talk some people into donating resources. 
HPUX is a glaring hole although I know you have that covered personally.

cheers

cheers

andrew