Re: PG Killed by OOM Condition

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Davis
Тема Re: PG Killed by OOM Condition
Дата
Msg-id 4342259D.1060102@empires.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PG Killed by OOM Condition  (mark@mark.mielke.cc)
Ответы Re: PG Killed by OOM Condition  (Dennis Bjorklund <db@zigo.dhs.org>)
Re: PG Killed by OOM Condition  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> It's not an easy decision. Linux isn't wrong. Solaris isn't wrong.
> Most people never hit these problems, and the people that do, are
> just as likely to hit one problem, or the other. The grass is always
> greener on the side of the fence that isn't hurting me right now,
> and all that.
> 
> Cheers,
> mark
> 

Thanks, a very informative reply.

Do you have some references where I can learn more?

I think that I've run into the OOM killer without a fork() being
involved, but I could be wrong. Is it possible to be hit by the OOM
killer if no applications use fork()?

Regards,Jeff Davis


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Rod Taylor
Дата:
Сообщение: Vacuum and Transactions
Следующее
От: Dennis Bjorklund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PG Killed by OOM Condition