Re: State of support for back PG branches

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paesold
Тема Re: State of support for back PG branches
Дата
Msg-id 4338E188.40809@gmx.at
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: State of support for back PG branches  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> To my mind the main rationale for continuing to support 7.2 is that it
> was the last pre-schema release, and so people whose apps haven't yet
> been fixed to cope with schemas will be on their own once we drop it.
> While each release has some portability gotchas, I don't think there
> have been any quite that big since then.  If we drop support for 7.2,
> it wouldn't be out of the question for us to drop 7.3 and 7.4 too (at
> least not from where I sit ... I'm sure some will differ).

Yes. For one of our application that makes massive use of triggers the 
transition from 7.2 to 7.3 was less painful than 7.4 to 8.0. Many of the 
triggers were written with the assumption that foreign key checks were 
effectively delayed until the end of the calling statement.

Just another opinion. Nevertheless if it's feasible to support 7.4 for a 
while, I would recommend it. Also from a marketing statepoint -- having 
back branches supported for a visible amount of time increases people's 
confident in PostgreSQL and it's stability.

Best Regards,
Michael Paesold


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: unchecked malloc
Следующее
От: Steve Atkins
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: State of support for back PG branches