Re: Open items list for 8.1
| От | Andrew Dunstan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Open items list for 8.1 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 43383E31.8060509@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Open items list for 8.1 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: >"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes: > > >>>>/contrib move to pgfoundry >>>> >>>> > > > >>Well pgFoundry isn't ready to have a load of code that is >>that actively maintained put on it. It still needs to be moved to >>its new servers. >> >> > >The modules proposed to be moved out aren't actively maintained now; >if they were we'd probably be keeping them in core. > > > Speaking as a pgFoundry admin, I would say if they aren't actively maintained we don't want them either. pgFoundry is not a dumping ground for modules that are dying. If they are not maintained then drop them. They can always be recovered from the CVS archive. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: