Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 12:10:19 -0400,
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
>
>>Is there an HTML standard that we try to follow in our HTML docs such as
>>FAQs?
>>
>>If there isn't an explicit standard, may I suggest that we adopt XHTML
>>1.0 as the standard?
>>
>>
>
>I ran accross an article a few weeks ago that suggested that this wasn't
>all that great of an idea. Using HTML 4.01 should be just as useful.
>
>
>
I ran a cross a man in the street the other day who told me just the
opposite ;-)
Seriously, if you to use an argument like this you need to cite the
article, or at the very least summarise its arguments.
XHTML is simply a minimal reformulation of HTML in XML, and even uses
the HTML 4.01 definitions for its semantics. Given that, it's hard to
see why it should be considered a bad thing.
cheers
andrew