Re: relation_expr vs. qualified_name

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: relation_expr vs. qualified_name
Дата
Msg-id 4320.1079581359@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на relation_expr vs. qualified_name  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> How come half the ALTER TABLE statements use relation_expr and half use 
> qualified_name?

relation_expr allows specification of "foo *" and "ONLY foo", and is
appropriate for ALTER commands that can recurse to child tables.
qualified_name is appropriate for the ones that are inherently
nonrecursive.

I'm entirely prepared to believe that some of them are misclassified in
the grammar ... you see any problems?
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Дата:
Сообщение: float8 regression test failure in head
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: float8 regression test failure in head