Re: Change in parameters' order in prepared statement??

Andres Olarte wrote:
> I recently updated the driver to the latest CVS version, and found a
> change in the way parameters are handled.  Before, the first parameter
> was 1, as in:
>
> update.setInt(1,cbid);
>
> But now it's 2, as in:
>
> update.setInt(2,cbid);
>
> I'm using only IN parameters to call a prepared SELECT. Is this the
> correct behaviour? Is it going to stay this way?

This sounds like a bug -- can you provide a more detailed testcase?

-O