Ron wrote:
> At 08:37 AM 8/30/2005, Alvaro Nunes Melo wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> We are about to install a new PostgreSQL server, and despite of being
>> a very humble configuration compared to the ones we see in the list,
>> it's the biggest one we've got till now.
>>
>> The server is a Dual Xeon 3.0 with 2 GB RAM and two SCSI disks. Our
>> main doubt is what is the best configuration for the disks. We are
>> thinking about use them in a RAID-0 array. Is this the best option?
>> What do you suggest on partitioning? Separate partitions for the OS,
>> data and pg_xlog?
>
>
> This is _very_ modest HW. Unless your DB and/or DB load is similarly
> modest, you are not going to be happy with the performance of your DBMS.
Well that is a pretty blanket statement. I have many customers who
happily run in less hardware that what is mentioned above.
It all depends on the application itself and how the database is utilized.
> At a minimum, for safety reasons you want 4 HDs: 2 for a RAID 1 set
> for the DB, and 2 for a RAID 1 set for the OS + pg_xlog.
> 2 extra HDs, even SCSI HDs, is cheap. Especially when compared to the
> cost of corrupted or lost data.
Your real test is going to be prototyping the performance you need. A
single RAID 1 mirror (don't use RAID 0) may be more
than enough. However based on the fact that you speced Xeons my guess is
you spent money on CPUs when you should have
spent money on hard drives.
If you still have the budget, I would suggest considering either what
Ron suggested or possibly using a 4 drive RAID 10 instead.
If you can't afford to put a couple more SCSI disks it may be worth
while to put a software RAID 1 with ATA disks for the OS and
swap and then use straight SCSI hardware RAID 1 for the DB. That will
allow you to push any swap operations off to the OS disks
without sacrificing the performance and reliability of the database itself.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> HD's and RAM are cheap enough that you should be able to upgrade in
> more ways, but do at least that "upgrade"!
>
> Beyond that, the best ways to spend you limited $ are highly dependent
> on your exact DB and its usage pattern.
>
> Ron Peacetree
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly