Re: benchmarking the query planner
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: benchmarking the query planner |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4313.1228931932@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: benchmarking the query planner ("Robert Haas" <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: benchmarking the query planner
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Robert Haas" <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>> I tried a different query, trying to get quadratic growth and again failed. It
> The profiling results I sent the other day show an exactly-linear
> increase in the number of times eqjoinsel invokes FunctionCall2.
> Reading through the the eqjoinsel_inner loop in selfuncs.c beginning
> around line 2042, I think what is happening is this: since the two
> tables are really the same table, nvalues1 and nvalues2 are the same
> array, and therefore contain the same elements in the same order.
Yeah, that would be fast. To see a quadratic case you need MCV arrays
that have little or no overlap of common values --- then each element of
the first will be compared (in vain) to all or most of the elements in
the second.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: