Re: Linux trademark and PostgreSQL
| От | Joshua D. Drake |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Linux trademark and PostgreSQL |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 43063AFC.5060609@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Linux trademark and PostgreSQL ("Lance Obermeyer" <LObermey@pervasive.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
> Whether the licensor (e.g. the owner of the mark) is a private individual or the "PostgreSQL Foundation" is not relevantfrom the perspective of the licensee. That is a separate question. > > Pervasive is interested in becoming a formal licensee of the mark. Just to be clear, we have no desire to be the exclusivelicensee. > We believe that the bar to becoming a licensee of the mark should be low, just as the bar to using the software is. Wewould >contribute to the creation of a licensing contract, up to assisting in the creation of a PostgreSQL Mark Institute as thelicensing vehicle if that is what makes the most sense. I believe using the PostgreSQL Foundation for this is the most appropriate. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: