Re: problems with new vacuum (??)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: problems with new vacuum (??)
Дата
Msg-id 4304.1009987000@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: problems with new vacuum (??)  (Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee> writes:
> Have you any ideas how to distinguish between interactive and
> non-interactive disk I/O coming from postgresql backends ?

I don't see how.  For one thing, the backend that originally dirtied
a buffer is not necessarily the one that writes it out.  Even assuming
that we could assign a useful priority to different I/O requests,
how do we tell the kernel about it?  There's no portable API for that
AFAIK.

One thing that would likely help a great deal is to have the WAL files
on a separate disk spindle, but since what I've got is a one-disk
system, I can't test that on this PC.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Matthew T. O'Connor"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: problems with new vacuum (??)
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Duplicate-key-detection failure case found in btree