Re: pl/Ruby, deprecating plPython and Core

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> 
>> I find the whole argument that, lack of an untrusted version of the PL 
>> means it should be deprecated, crazy. There are plenty of situations 
>> where you don't care that the PL is untrusted.
> 
> 
> Yes you are absolutely correct. However my argument was more than that.

Right.

I was responding to the entire thread that was headed in the direction 
of saying that just because a language doe not have a trusted PL 
version, it should be removed.

As others have said, I find myself using PL/pgSQL when I need trusted, 
and frequently use other languages when I need untrusted. And in most of 
my experience, I don't even care if the language is trusted or 
untrusted. There are plenty of use cases for both.

Joe