Dave Cramer wrote:
> Well, if we are going to consider pljava for the main distribution,
> then we should consider pl-j for inclusion as well.
I believe we should consider both but only include 1.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Dave
> On 16-Aug-05, at 11:53 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>>
>>> I think you should take a closer look at PL/Java for the following
>>> reasons:
>>>
>>
>> Hmmm, this brings up a good point. If we're going to consider PL/
>> Ruby for
>> main distro in 8.2, should we not consider PL/Java as well?
>>
>> --
>> Josh Berkus
>> Aglio Database Solutions
>> San Francisco
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
>> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/