On 07/08/2018 15:29, Andres Freund wrote:
> I don't think that solves the problem that an arriving relcache
> invalidation would trigger a rebuild of rd_partdesc, while it actually
> is referenced by running code.
The problem is more generally that a relcache invalidation changes all
pointers that might be in use. So it's currently not safe to trigger a
relcache invalidation (on tables) without some kind of exclusive lock.
One possible solution to this is outlined here:
<https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmobtmFT5g-0dA=vEFFtogjRAuDHcYPw+qEdou5dZPnF=pg@mail.gmail.com>
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services