Re: distributed performance testing
| От | Andrew Dunstan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: distributed performance testing |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 42FE7712.2060705@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: distributed performance testing (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: >Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > > >>Incidentally, use of a different SCM system might well make >>constructing test sets more simple. Imagine, say, in SVN, you would >>create a branch called "test-set-yyyy-mm-dd" or some such, make your >>changes there, add a test script under some well known name, and commit >>the branch. >> >> > >This seems a pretty unconvincing argument for SVN ... we could perfectly >well do that in CVS, no? > > > > You could well be right. And I should know better than to engage in speculation like that and possibly cause us to be inundated by proponents of SCMfoo, most of whom will never write a line of code for postgres let alone ever have to commit anything ;-) Pardon my weakness. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: