Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch
| От | Andreas Pflug |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 42FD3393.7050402@pse-consulting.de обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch
|
| Список | pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > I don't assume people using psql will care about the current log files --- Hm. Probably because you think these users will have direct file access? Which in turn means they can edit *.conf directly too and don't need an interface for that either. > it would be something done in C or another application language. Aren't > the file names already ordered based on their file names, given the > default pattern, postgresql-%Y-%m-%d_%H%M%S.log? The issue is _filtering_, not ordering. Since the log directory might be directed to a different location, non-pgsql logfiles might be there too. You'd probably won't expect to retrieve these files over a pgsql connection. Regards, Andreas
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: