Re: SQLException and error code

Kevin Grittner wrote:
> To better support existing applications which (for reasons I don't
> really understand) rely on the vendor-specific errorCode instead of the
> ANSI-standard sqlState, you could implement getErrorCode as:
>
>     return Integer.parseInt(getSqlState(), 36);

Ow! It seems a bit pointless though, honestly..

Going to wait for a reply from the original poster, I still don't
understand what Peter wants getErrorCode() to return..

-O