Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux

Csaba Nagy wrote:
> [snip]
>
>>wasn't the whole thread.  I agree with you that if we make setString
>>default to UNKNOWN, there had better be a way to say "by golly this
>>really is TEXT" for the corner cases.  It'd be a good idea if it wasn't
>>limited to TEXT, either, but could allow specification of any random
>>datatype.
>
>
> This makes me think, isn't it possible to introduce a special type to
> say something like: setObject(..., Types.UNKNOWN),

I expect you can do this already with a PGobject implementantion. It
might be nice to make it directly support String too.

-O