Roberta Campo wrote:
> A. Using the setArray method :
> This requires the implementation of the interface java.sql.Array :
> - which methods are required in this case ?
> - is there any available implementation of this class ? :)
Someone else replied to this with an implementation..
The driver's Array support is pretty bad currently. It will only work if
the Array implementation implements:
- getBaseTypeName() returns the underlying postgresql type name ("int")
- toString() returns a correctly-formatted array string ("{1,2,3}")
Proper support for arbitrary Array implementations (and bare arrays via
setObject) has been on my todo list for ages but it's no longer a high
priority for our application so I doubt I'll work on it any time soon :/
> B. Using the setObject(colnumber, String, type ) method :
> This should require less implementation than the Array, shouldn't it ?
> - how to specify the type int[] ?
JDBC has no mechanism to specify a particular array type via a Types.*
constant unfortunately :(
> C. Using different drivers / protocol versions / ...
Using protocol version 2 as Dave Cramer suggests is a short-term fix but
you don't want to be using that in the longer term..
-O