I am totally confused by your response and Luke's. I think we might be
talking completely at cross purposes. My original question had nothing
to do with the COPY patch.
cheers
andrew
Ayush Parashar wrote:
>Andrew, Luke,
>
>As pointed by Luke, the reason for using mb regression suite (src/test/mb),
>is to consolidate all similar kinds of multi-byte/client encoding tests at
>one place.
>
>Thanks,
>Ayush
>
>On 7/15/05 1:36 PM, "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan@greenplum.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>>Andrew,
>>
>>
>>
>>>Good. So should we roll this up into the standard regression suite? Why
>>>are these tests separate? Is it just that they need a UTF8 encoded db
>>>rather than an SQL-ASCII encoded db?
>>>
>>>
>>I think that was the idea - the src/test/mb kit was already there and was
>>designed to create the UTF8 database and controlled circumstances for a
>>conversion test, so we used it for the similar testing for COPY.
>>
>>It could possibly be moved into the "make check" regression suite, if the
>>regression DB is always created with UTF8.
>>
>>Ayush may be able to add to this.
>>
>>- Luke
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>
>
>