Re: contrib/pgcrypto functions not IMMUTABLE?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Neil Conway
Тема Re: contrib/pgcrypto functions not IMMUTABLE?
Дата
Msg-id 42C893F6.7010303@samurai.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: contrib/pgcrypto functions not IMMUTABLE?  (Marko Kreen <marko@l-t.ee>)
Ответы Re: contrib/pgcrypto functions not IMMUTABLE?  (Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Marko Kreen wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 07:54:47AM -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote:
>>In the functions marked STRICT, should I leave the PG_ARGISNULL()
>>checks in place as a precaution?  Removing those checks could cause
>>problems if people use the new code but have old (non-STRICT) catalog
>>entries.
> 
> Good point.  Let them be.

Assuming the STRICT / IMMUTABLE changes are only going into HEAD, you 
can safely remove the PG_ARGISNULL() checks -- people upgrading from a 
prior version of Postgres (and therefore pgcrypto) will need to dump and 
reload anyway.

-Neil


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: bug in ALTER TABLE / TYPE
Следующее
От: Michael Fuhr
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: contrib/pgcrypto functions not IMMUTABLE?