Re: Sizes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joe
Тема Re: Sizes
Дата
Msg-id 42C5A008.1090803@freedomcircle.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Sizes  (Matt Miller <mattm@epx.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Matt Miller wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 07:50 -0700, Bob Pawley wrote:
>
>>what are the number of  schemas, tables and views that would
>>constitute a databse considered to be small, medium or large?
>
>
> Totally subjective opinion:
>
> Small database:  few dozen tables/views
> Medium database: 100 tables/views
> Large database:  1000 tables/views
>
> Small table:  few dozen rows
> Medium table: few thousand rows
> Large table:  millions of rows

Another completely subjective opinion:  when people talk about large or very
large databases (VLDB) they usually refer to the amount of data, not the number
of tables or views.  For example, a database that occupied 50 GB would be
considered large even it had a dozen tables (most likely with a few of those
having millions of rows).  Conversely, a database with 500 tables but occupying
only 1/2 GB would likely be considered small or medium.

Joe


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: MargaretGillon@chromalloy.com
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: How to know if a TRANSACTION isn't completed
Следующее
От: "Thomas F. O'Connell"
Дата:
Сообщение: PostgreSQL Hosting