Re: Open items
| От | Satoshi Nagayasu |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Open items |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 42C39598.70301@nttdata.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Open items (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Open items
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: >>My patch counts inittapes(), tuplesort_begin_heap() and >>tuplesort_begin_index(), and collect them, and sum them through the >>stat collector. > > > Hm, that doesn't seem like quite the right level to be counting at. > Shouldn't you be hacking fd.c to count operations on FD_XACT_TEMPORARY > files? Why do you think so? I don't see tuplesort.c is good or not. But all code of sort operations are in tuplesort.c. So I thought it is a good place to count them up. Of course, I can move my code to fd.c if it will be reasonable. -- NAGAYASU Satoshi <nagayasus@nttdata.co.jp>
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: