Re: Utility database (Was: RE: Autovacuum in the backend)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Christopher Kings-Lynne
Тема Re: Utility database (Was: RE: Autovacuum in the backend)
Дата
Msg-id 42B28E07.8010508@familyhealth.com.au
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Utility database (Was: RE: Autovacuum in the backend)  ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>)
Ответы Re: Utility database (Was: RE: Autovacuum in the backend)  (Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> I think this is a very good idea. I've come up against this need once or
> twice before.. And the fact that stuff in template1 gets propagated out
> to all newly created databases can be a major pain when this happens.
> 
> A shared database for this stuff would be great - then each tool could
> just create a schema for it's own stuff.
> 
> How does pgAdmin deal with this today?

In phpPgAdmin the default db to connect to can be specified per-server 
in the config file.  It defaults to template1.  It actually is not 
relevant at all which db it is, so long as they can connect to it.

Chris



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andreas Pflug
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Utility database (Was: RE: Autovacuum in the backend)
Следующее
От: Russell Smith
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Autovacuum in the backend