Re: patch for passing the cts
| От | Oliver Jowett |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: patch for passing the cts |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 42AF6682.6000405@opencloud.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | patch for passing the cts (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: patch for passing the cts
|
| Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Dave Cramer wrote:
> Well the good news is that the driver and the backend will pass the cts
> with this patch.
>
> Rather than commit this as is, I'd like to discuss the patch as it is.
>
> I'm really not happy with the handling of IN/OUT parameters in the
> query executor, however deferring parsing doesn't seem to be an option
> either.
I don't think your approach works, though; consider this (untested) example:
CallableStatement cs = conn.prepareCall("{call f(?*4,?)}");
cs.setInt(1,42);
cs.registerOutParameter(2,Types.INTEGER);
The query gets parsed into these fragments:
0:"select * from f("
1:"*4,"
2:") as result"
As I read your code, that's going to discard fragment 1 blindly in the
query executor, resulting in this query:
"select * from f($1) as result"
which is wrong.
The logic that decides to remove OUT placeholders needs to be aware of
the rest of the {call} structure (mainly, comma separation of
parameters) to do it correctly, and I really don't think that the
QueryExecutor implementations are the right place for that..
-O
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: