Gevik,
You still didn't answer my question as to why you're reinventing the
wheel. Why not just work on updating techdocs instead?
-Jonah
Tom Flavel wrote:
>On 04/06/2005 22:59:19, Gevik babakhani wrote:
>
>
>>Dear all,
>>
>>The PostgreSQL Developer Network's Source Browser (beta1) is ready.
>>
>>If you got the time to check it for a moment, please do not hesitate to send
>>
>>
>
>Firstly, good that you're asking for comments (I assume as an attempt to
>work with people), but starting an entirley seperatre "developer network"
>seems rather like reinventing the wheel. Why not invest your time in
>extending the existing rersources, rather than starting from scratch?
>
>
>Other than saving me from downloading the source (which I keep around
>anyway, mostly for ease of grepping for things the documentation cant be
>expected to cover), I see no advantage to using this in it's current
>form.
>
>To me, the point of a source browsing system is that it provides
>information which a directory structure can't provide. Off the top of my
>head:
>
>* CVS head. Without this, it's always going to be irrelevant to
> developers who commit to postgresql itself.
>* CVS history. If you're targeting this at developers, I'd think this is
> important.
>* Referencing between function calls and definitions (with ctags,
> perhaps. Doxygen-style browsers do this.) To me, this is the single
> only advantage of presenting source code in HTML: ease of navigation
> by hyperlinks. Apart from that, web pages are pretty inconvenient (to
> me, at least).
>* Is a tree really appropiate? To compare two files (which is something
> I might want to use this for), that'd require a lot of scrolling to
> see where I am in the structure.
>* diff.
>
>
>Meanwhile, some aesthetic things which spring to mind:
>
>The syntax hilighting is confusing for non-.c files; quite a few are
>parsed incorrectly around comments, and hilighting applied to strange
>things in plain-text files.
>
>There is extreneous whitespace in the <pre> at the top by the line
>numbers' gutters. There's a off-by-one error in your loop to pad out the
>numbers: an extra space appears every power of 10.
>
>The "number of views" is irrelevant, as is the "...Source Browser" title
>on each page, which is unneccessary.
>
>Hope that helps,
>
>
>