Re: PostgreSQL vs. InnoDB performance
| От | Joshua D. Drake |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PostgreSQL vs. InnoDB performance |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 429F8BB3.90801@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | PostgreSQL vs. InnoDB performance (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On a particular system, loading 1 million rows (100 bytes, nothing > fancy) into PostgreSQL one transaction at a time takes about 90 > minutes. Doing the same in MySQL/InnoDB takes about 3 minutes. InnoDB > is supposed to have a similar level of functionality as far as the > storage manager is concerned, so I'm puzzled about how this can be. > Does anyone know whether InnoDB is taking some kind of questionable > shortcuts it doesn't tell me about? What about fsync/opensync and wal segments? What happens if we turn off fsync entirely? The client interface is DBI. This > particular test is supposed to simulate a lot of transactions happening > in a short time, so turning off autocommit is not relevant. > > As you might imagine, it's hard to argue when the customer sees these > kinds of numbers. So I'd take any FUD I can send back at them. :) > -- Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240 PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: