Re: NOLOGGING option, or ?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joe Conway
Тема Re: NOLOGGING option, or ?
Дата
Msg-id 429E3F61.8040003@joeconway.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: NOLOGGING option, or ?  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 10:35 -0700, Alon Goldshuv wrote:
>>2) A modified command syntax for introducing a direct single row error
>>handling. By direct I mean - a row that if rejected from within the COPY

>>5) allow an ERRORLIMIT to allow control of aborting a load after a certain
>>number of errors (and a pre-requisite for this is point number 2 above).

> 2) and 5) seem critical for combined usability & performance with real
> world data.

I'll second that! This would be a huge win for one of my real world 
applications, whether implemented as a new command, or as added 
capability on top of COPY. The other performance enhancements would 
certainly be nice to have also, but in my experience not nearly as 
important as these two.

Joe


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: NOLOGGING option, or ?
Следующее
От: "Alon Goldshuv"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: NOLOGGING option, or ?