Re: Strange Query Question

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Strange Query Question
Дата
Msg-id 4298.974751177@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Strange Query Question  (OTR Comm <otrcomm@wildapache.net>)
Список pgsql-novice
OTR Comm <otrcomm@wildapache.net> writes:
> $query = qq|SELECT ap.id, ap.invnumber, vendor.name,
>               acc_trans.transdate, ap.invoice, acc_trans.amount
>               FROM ap, acc_trans
>               WHERE $where
>               AND acc_trans.accno = $form->{accno}
>               AND acc_trans.trans_id = ap.id
>               AND ap.vendor = vendor.id|;

> The code executes properly, but I do not see how this query can work
> without a FROM reference to the vendor table.  How does this happen?

Postgres lets you get away with that.  It's not strictly legal per
SQL92, but the equivalent construction worked in the old PostQuel
language, and we've just sort of never wanted to break it.

This has confused a lot of people, so beginning in 7.1 there'll be
a warning notice when you mix explicit-FROM and implied-FROM styles
as above:

NOTICE:  Adding missing FROM-clause entry for table "vendor"

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: OTR Comm
Дата:
Сообщение: Strange Query Question
Следующее
От: "D. Duccini"
Дата:
Сообщение: MODPERL EXAMPLE ?