> What I'm wondering is whether this is really worth doing or not.
> There are currently just two parts of the lexer rules that are affected
> --- the {real} rule illustrated above, and the rules that allow quoted
> strings to be split across lines as the SQL spec requires. But the
> patches are still pretty ugly, and what's really annoying is that there
> doesn't seem to be any way to get flex to complain if someone later
> makes a change that breaks the no-backup-cases property again.
I was just thinking that if there's not a switch, it's prone to error again.
However, the lexer isn't touched anywhere near as much as the grammar is right? So just put a large
comment/warning/reminderat the top to
test for non-backup states.
I'm definitely in favour of a 1/3 speedup of the lexer.
Chris