Dennis Bjorklund wrote:
> Here is a small patch that implements a function lastval() that
> works just like currval() except that it give the current
> value of the last sequence used by nextval().
What do people think of this idea? (Tom seems opposed, I'm just
wondering if there are other opinions out there.)
I like the concept, but I haven't looked at the code -- I'd be happy to
review the implementation, although I won't waste my time if most people
are opposed to the idea itself.
-Neil