Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4279.1304731070@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default? (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default?
Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default? |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> As a packager, what I'd really want to see from a division into
>> recommended and not-so-recommended packages is that they get installed
>> into different subdirectories by "make install".
> Well, that might be good, too. But, right now, if someone pulls up
> our documentation, or our source tree, they could easily be forgiven
> for thinking that hstore and dummy_seclabel are comparable, and they
> aren't.
Sure, but that's a documentation issue, which again is not going to be
helped by a source-tree rearrangement.
As somebody who spends a lot of time on back-patching, I'm not excited
in the least by suggestions to rearrange the source tree for marginal
cosmetic benefits, which is all that I see here.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: