Re: 'prepare' is not quite schema-safe
| От | Neil Conway |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: 'prepare' is not quite schema-safe |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4275AD00.90303@samurai.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: 'prepare' is not quite schema-safe (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: 'prepare' is not quite schema-safe
Re: 'prepare' is not quite schema-safe Re: [Dbdpg-general] Re: 'prepare' is not quite schema-safe |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote: > That's what it is supposed to do. It would hardly be possible to > "prepare" a query at all if we had to wait till EXECUTE to find out > which tables it was supposed to use. An alternative would be to flush dependent plans when the schema search path is changed. In effect this would mean flushing *all* prepared plans whenever the search path changes: we could perhaps keep plans that only contain explicit namespace references, but that seems fragile. Flushing all plans might well be a cure that is worth than the disease, at least for a lot of users. -Neil
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: