Re: Serial / auto increment data type
| От | Tony Caduto |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Serial / auto increment data type |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 426FFFA3.9030204@amsoftwaredesign.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Serial / auto increment data type (Typing80wpm@aol.com) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Yes, that is the way to do it. I migrated several large Access DB to postgres and most of the tables that where done by the non developers didn't have a primary key defined, so the easiest way was just to add a new field to every table and makeit a serial. I believe you would have to do this even if you were using MS SQL server as the backend. > Here is my question. Would I be wise to define each and ever table with > a serial id, so that I may always be guaranteed something uniqe, to > satisfy Access. It seems to me like no harm can be done, since if you > dont need the serial id, you dont need it, but it is always there if you > do need it, and it is harder to add such a field down the line, after > the fact. > > Thanks! -- Tony Caduto AM Software Design Home of PG Lightning Admin for Postgresql 8.x http://www.amsoftwaredesign.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: