Re: pgbench Comparison of 7.4.7 to 8.0.2
| От | Steve Poe |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pgbench Comparison of 7.4.7 to 8.0.2 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 426E7F3A.8000500@sfnet.cc обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pgbench Comparison of 7.4.7 to 8.0.2 (Thomas F.O'Connell <tfo@sitening.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Tom, Honestly, you've got me. It was either comment from Tom Lane or Josh that the os is caching the results (I may not be using the right terms here), so I thought it the database is dropped and recreated, I would see less of a skew (or variation) in the results. Someone which to comment? Steve Poe Thomas F.O'Connell wrote: > Considering the default vacuuming behavior, why would this be? > > -tfo > > -- > Thomas F. O'Connell > Co-Founder, Information Architect > Sitening, LLC > > Strategic Open Source: Open Your iâ„¢ > > http://www.sitening.com/ > 110 30th Avenue North, Suite 6 > Nashville, TN 37203-6320 > 615-260-0005 > > On Apr 25, 2005, at 12:18 PM, Steve Poe wrote: > >> Tom, >> >> Just a quick thought: after each run/sample of pgbench, I drop the >> database and recreate it. When I don't my results become more skewed. >> >> Steve Poe > >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: