| От | Neil Conway |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [pgsql-www] Software Patents |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4269AC46.1000505@samurai.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [pgsql-www] Software Patents (Chris Travers <chris@travelamericas.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Chris Travers wrote: > Would you be opposed to a simple writeup of why ARC was replaced with 2Q > and why IBM's assurances of non-enforcement against open source products > was insufficient? I think a fair number of individuals were somewhat confused by how we dealt with the ARC situation. Explaining what our reasoning was is probably a good idea. > Or in your view, should we be directing people to the mailing list > archives for their primary source on the political positions we as a > community have been forced to take for reasons beyond our immediate > control? I don't see how we've taken a "political position" due to ARC. We had a problem that might have inhibited the use of PostgreSQL by some people, so we worked around it. -Neil
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления:
Сайт использует файлы cookie для корректной работы и повышения удобства. Нажимая кнопку «Принять» или продолжая пользоваться сайтом, вы соглашаетесь на их использование в соответствии с Политикой в отношении обработки cookie ООО «ППГ», в том числе на передачу данных из файлов cookie сторонним статистическим и рекламным службам. Вы можете управлять настройками cookie через параметры вашего браузера