Statistics mismatch between n_live_tup and actual row count
| От | Andreas Brandl |
|---|---|
| Тема | Statistics mismatch between n_live_tup and actual row count |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4260256.28.1323361122333.JavaMail.root@store1.zcs.ext.wpsrv.net обсуждение |
| Ответы |
Re: Statistics mismatch between n_live_tup and actual row count
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Hi, we're currently investigating a statistics issue on postgres. We have some tables which frequently show up with strange valuesfor n_live_tup. If you compare those values with a count on that particular table, there is a mismatch of factor 10-30.This causes the planner to come up with very bad plans (we also have this issue on bigger table like the one below). db=# SELECT relname, n_live_tup, last_analyze, last_autoanalyze FROM pg_stat_user_tables WHERE schemaname = 's' AND relname= 't'; relname | n_live_tup | last_analyze | last_autoanalyze ----------+------------+-------------------------------+------------------------------- t | 7252 | 2011-12-08 03:00:02.556088+01 | 2011-12-01 18:29:00.536321+01 db=# SELECT COUNT(*) FROM s.t; count ------- 280 The strange thing is, if we run an ANALYZE on this table, the statistic is good. 10 minutes later it's bad again. We suspectone of our processes which might do unnecessary (i.e. blind) updates. Can this be the cause of the statistics problem? PostgreSQL 9.1.1 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc-4.6.real (Debian 4.6.2-4) 4.6.2, 64-bit The migration to 9.1 did not fix this problem, as we already have this since 8.4. I can provide all postgres configuration, but I don't see anything we changed (compared to the default config), which mightbe related here. Any clue appreciated here! Best regards Andy
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: