Re: "UNION ALL" is failing
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: "UNION ALL" is failing |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4260.1314366750@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | "UNION ALL" is failing (Joy Smith <freestuffanddeals@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: "UNION ALL" is failing
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Joy Smith <freestuffanddeals@gmail.com> writes:
> column types are the same so I don't know why this 'union all' is failing.
It's a syntax error --- got nothing to do with column types.
I think what you need to do is parenthesize the first subquery. ORDER
BY isn't allowed to be attached to a UNION subquery otherwise. You're
probably going to need to parenthesize the second subquery too ---
otherwise it will think that that ORDER BY applies to the UNION result,
not the subquery.
I don't offhand remember the syntactic precedence of WITH versus UNION,
but trying to attach WITHs to the subqueries might be another reason to
need parentheses.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: