Re: MERGE ... RETURNING

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Davis
Тема Re: MERGE ... RETURNING
Дата
Msg-id 425bd4540c7bf6f35bf3afbef012fbf360d13764.camel@j-davis.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: MERGE ... RETURNING  (Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>)
Ответы Re: MERGE ... RETURNING
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2023-07-12 at 03:47 +0200, Vik Fearing wrote:

> There is no RETURNING clause in Standard SQL, and the way they would
> do
> this is:
>
>      SELECT ...
>      FROM OLD TABLE (
>          MERGE ...
>      ) AS m
>
> The rules for that for MERGE are well defined.

I only see OLD TABLE referenced as part of a trigger definition. Where
is it defined for MERGE?

In any case, as long as the SQL standard doesn't conflict, then we're
fine. And it looks unlikely to cause a conflict right now that wouldn't
also be a conflict with our existing RETURNING clause elsewhere, so I'm
not seeing a problem here.

Regards,
    Jeff Davis




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Meson build updates
Следующее
От: "Tristan Partin"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Meson build updates