Re: OUT parameters in PL/Java

Tom Lane wrote:

>You could do worse than to back-port get_call_result_type() into your
>older branches and just leave out the code for the OUT parameter case.
>  
>
Great advice! I went ahead and did just that. Now PL/Java handles 
IN/INOUT/OUT parameters correctly with 8.1 and it handles functions 
returning SETOF RECORD in all versions. The only thing that doesn't work 
right now is a function that returns RECORD (not SETOF) since the rsinfo 
in this case is NULL. Can you shed some light on that?

Regards,
Thomas Hallgren