Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

Tom Lane wrote:

>Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>
>
>>... If there are no license or build issues I'm in favor.
>>
>>
>
>Peter has pointed out that the problem of circular dependencies is a
>showstopper for integrating plPHP.  The build order has to be
>    Postgres
>    PHP (since its existing DB support requires Postgres to build)
>    plPHP
>so putting #1 and #3 into the same package is a no go.  Which is too
>bad, but I see no good way around it.
>
>
>
>

Oh. I didn't see that - I assumed that it had been fixed. (My email has
been AWOL for 48 hours).

cheers

andrew