Re: Alternative to psql -c ?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Alternative to psql -c ? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 42493.1403805729@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Alternative to psql -c ? (James Le Cuirot <chewi@aura-online.co.uk>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Alternative to psql -c ?
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
James Le Cuirot <chewi@aura-online.co.uk> writes:
> This got me wondering what Rails uses. I dug into ActiveRecord and
> found that apart from the odd call to PQexec with hardcoded single
> statements, it uses PQsendQuery. The libpq docs state a few of the
> differences but don't mention whether PQsendQuery automatically creates
> a transaction like PQexec does. Please could you clarify this?
PG is not capable of executing queries that are not in transactions,
so yes, PQsendQuery will create a single-statement transaction if you
haven't sent BEGIN. However, there's a huge difference for the
purposes we're discussing here: PQsendQuery does not allow more than
one SQL command in the string. So most of this discussion is irrelevant
when you're going through that API.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: