Re: [HACKERS] ANALYZE getting dead tuple count hopelessly wrong

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] ANALYZE getting dead tuple count hopelessly wrong
Дата
Msg-id 4236.1207242598@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] ANALYZE getting dead tuple count hopelessly wrong  ("Pavan Deolasee" <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] ANALYZE getting dead tuple count hopelessly wrong  ("Pavan Deolasee" <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
"Pavan Deolasee" <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com> writes:
> Thanks. I had another concern about VACUUM not reporting DEAD line
> pointers (please see up thread). Any comments on that ?

If you want to work on that, go ahead, but I wanted it separate because
I didn't think it merited back-patching.  It's strictly cosmetic in
terms of being about what VACUUM VERBOSE prints, no?

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PG 8.3.x doesn't get build
Следующее
От: Steve Atkins
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Secure "where in(a,b,c)" clause.