Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies
От | Thomas Hallgren |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4230E80F.2000903@mailblocks.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies (Laszlo Hornyak <kocka@forgeahead.hu>) |
Ответы |
Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Laszlo Hornyak wrote: > IMHO this is why decoupling is good and neccesary. If one configures > the RDBMS to use different another of data, then I simply replace a > couple of lines in the data mapping configuration. In the case of > custom datatypes in PostgreSQL, the same happens. This is no code > modification nor recomplitation in PL-J, only a reconfiguration. > This is why I have sent that link, but this configuration file > fragment may explain it better: > <typemapper> > <map> > <type db="timestamp" > class="org.pgj.typemapping.postgres.PGTimestamp"/> > <!-- type db="timestamp" > class="org.pgj.typemapping.postgres.PGTimestampINT64"/ --> Sure Laszlo. That solves everything. But where do you get the information on what to comment out and what to use in the first place? Regards, Thomas Hallgren
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: