Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Kevin HaleBoyes
Тема Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP
Дата
Msg-id 4230901A.3080101@chartwelltechnology.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Would those of you with access to other DBMSes try this:
> 
> create table tab (col integer);
> select 1 from tab having 1=0;
> select 1 from tab having 1=1;
> insert into tab values(1);
> insert into tab values(2);
> select 1 from tab having 1=0;
> select 1 from tab having 1=1;
> 
> I claim that a SQL-conformant database will return 0, 1, 0, and 1 rows
> from the 4 selects --- that is, the contents of tab make no difference
> at all.  (MySQL returns 0, 0, 0, and 2 rows, so they are definitely
> copying our mistake...)
> 
>             regards, tom lane
From SQL server 2000 with a service pack, I get:

zero rows from the first query (having 1=0);
one row, col value 1, from second query (having 1=1);
...run inserts...
zero rows from the third query (having 1=0);
one row, col value 1, from forth query (having 1=1);

K.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Bort, Paul"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Raw size
Следующее
От: "Barry Lind"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY