Re: partitionning
| От | Joe Conway |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: partitionning |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 42300F9C.9030801@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: partitionning (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Greg Stark wrote: > > Actually I have a strong feeling what really _ought_ to happen here is that > the inherited tables support in postgres, which never really worked anyways, > should be deprecated and eventually removed. All that infrastructure should be > repurposed into partitioned tables. That seems like it would be a nice fit. > I don't know about deprecating inheritance, but I agree with pretty much everything Greg has said on this thread. In particular, I have felt for several years now that the inheritance infrastructure could be used to implement table partitioning. We're using inheritance for DIY table partitioning on very expensive storage hardware (~$500K), and we'd be dead in the water without it. Joe
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: